Why make a secret of the fact, with which camera they recorded the photo here people?
It might be wedding photography contract time that the FC reads the EXIF's from the photos and displays. Maybe it's because BB´s is ultimately matter, with which camera the image is?
Demand will probably be the most response.
Only that friends often helps nothing because you have another light, on-site aren't other equipment, etc.
Read with the eyes, then looking in the own stock of materials and consider how you can handle it so great with your media likely leads to the goal.
If the EXIF data in images are => just download the image and show can be.
You'll notice that with the vast number of photos are no EXIF data in images. Either consciously or unconsciously by the photographer before the upload deleted.
Komtm drafu on how you define it. Alone to see it in the browser have you download it. :-)
But because (in the browser to display the things) I didn't think really. Thanks for the note.
I look at the EXIFs always in an offline viewer. The other variants in the browser I never saw what all is in the EXIFs is also displayed. Usually they are limited to the bare necessities or a selection of information.
Which browser (evt. Ad-on) you are using?Because it doesn't matter first, and secondly sometimes is turned on because the equipment.
Who wants to know it also can ask for. There are but tools that the exifs in the browser when the right click Show.
I hired then save without EXIF with me as still 200 K, the images were allowed to be big because the EXIFs finally sit in right.
If you're really interested you can also write the photographer. I make no secret of it, will offer but also no EXIFs. On the other hand, the equipment is only interesting if the displayed result can not be achieved with other industry standard cameras. That would be, for example, when an infrared tag the case or "Exotics" like the EOS 20Da.
EXIFs of other interest me more than if would like to ask about a problem here and you really help. Ask all the time is somewhat tedious. At the most communities include the EXIF's standard. I find it interesting the camera data, because you can learn again what. Is matter of opinion but safe.
EXIF data may also intentionally misleading: should usually rather a trend there, to replace the camera model, yes not suspected to expose oneself, to specify with expensive equipment with a smaller.
Apart from a single set of EXIF data in each case would be misleading in a composing (Moon tinkering) as above.
